Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 03/03/2025 (433 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Amid the torrent of bad news coming at Canadians from many directions — but especially south — it’s good to take time to appreciate a positive move when it happens.

On that note, Manitoba has the distinction of being the first province to jump aboard the federal government’s national pharmacare program, which will see diabetes medication and birth control covered by federal funding.

Manitoba’s deal with Ottawa — which will see the federal government spend $219 million on pharmacare for the province over four years — is hopefully one of many to be inked across the country. Manitoba’s coverage is expected to start in June.

These baby steps into a comprehensive national pharmacare are welcome — and overdue. As much as Canadians take pride in our national health care (despite its struggles), the system has long covered less than it could. Between pharmacare and federally supported dental care for Canadians, the country is heading toward a much more holistic way of covering its citizens’ needs.

However, should pharmacare become a success and broaden to cover more medications down the line, it doesn’t do much to solve more immediate crises in health care. Manitoba continues to deal with long wait times and staffing issues. Removing a fee for patients at the pharmacist’s counter isn’t going to do anything to help those big, structural problems — we must continue to push government to find solutions to those problems.

However, anything that lightens the financial load for Manitobans, and eliminates hassle (who likes having to claim a health-care expense after the fact?) is undoubtedly a good thing. And yes, there’s a political angle to it as well — it’s heartening to see government, at any level, take steps to try to improve the lives of Canadians, as our neighbours to the south deal with a government that is gutting itself and seemingly engineering future precarity at every turn.

Conservative critics bemoan the idea that Ottawa’s universal program will have the effect ofkicking Canadians off their workplace insurance,echoing a common complaint when the subject ofstate-run health care is proposed at all in the U.S.

It seems an ill-advised line of attack.

So long as the federal program works, it’s unlikely most Canadians will mind that theyno longer have to pay into an additional insurance plan — or pay as much, anyway — if their national insurance grows to cover more types of care.

Yes, between national and workplace or other private benefits, Canadians do have prettycomprehensive health-care coverage. But whyjuggle two, or three, different health insuranceswhen one can do the job? Provided it’s run well, a“no-muss, no-fuss proposition” is a winner.

The question is: what comes next for this newpharmacare program?

Federal officials have been clear that diabetes medications and birth control are only the first prescriptions to be covered under this new program, and that expanding it will not be a quick or easy process — out of necessity, if the program is to last. This applies not just to expanding the program but laying the ground floor, by bringing other provinces and territories into the fold.

“If this is going to be enduring, it has to be done right,” federal Health Minister Mark Holland said this week.

That’s quite right, but that’s no reason to drag one’s heels on the next step, either. Many Canadians — those facing high medication costs forchronic conditions, for instance — are surely awaiting word on where the federal government takes this program next.

And all of us hope that this good sign is just oneof many to come, and Ottawa’s multibillion-dollar plan to bring pharmacare to Canadians proves to be a successful treatment for some of the things which ail us.

» Winnipeg Free Press